Brand Intelligence Platform

Your brand has two stories. We measure the distance between them.

There's the story you're telling — and the one your customers are telling each other on Reddit, X, TikTok, YouTube, and in the answers AI assistants give about you. GapWatch tracks the gap between the two, in real time, and tells you which way it's moving. And who's talking about it organically.

Book a walkthrough

Live data. Real conversations. No setup required for your first look — we'll show you your brand, not a demo brand.

Most brands are flying blind in three places at once.

The three gaps

The conversations you can't staff.

The real talk about your brand happens in comment threads at 11pm — thousands of posts across six platforms, in communities your team doesn't have the hours to read. By the time it reaches a news cycle, the story has already hardened.

The middle where brands go to die.

Most measurement tells you your sentiment is “neutral.” Neutral isn’t safe — it’s invisible. The brands that win are loved. The ones that get ignored sit in the indifferent middle, and no standard dashboard tells you whether you’re sinking into it or climbing out.

The answer engines you can't see into.

When someone asks ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity about your category, what do they say about you? AI assistants are becoming a primary recommendation channel, and almost no one is measuring how they describe — or omit — your brand.

Flagship feature

See whether people care — and which direction it's moving.

Built on the Mackalski Index, a polarization metric developed by Dr. Robert Mackalski (PhD, marketing; Harvard Business Review case author), GapWatch classifies every brand mention on a lover–hater scale and tracks the distribution over time.

One chart tells you three things a snapshot can't: whether your brand is poised for growth, contraction, or stagnation; how effective your marketing efforts actually are — and how far they're being amplified; and how you benchmark against competitors and best-in-class brands outside your category.

  • Is your campaign creating real demand, or are people saying "cute" and moving on?
  • Is your neutral middle shrinking or growing, week over week?
  • Where do your lovers live, and where do your haters concentrate? (Platform-attributed, so the answer maps directly to your channel allocation.)
  • What changed since a date you choose — a launch, a campaign flight, a crisis?

Mackalski Index — Polarization Over Time

As of June 11, 2026 · Illustrative snapshot

Lover / Neutral / Hater distribution, weekly rolling average — sample brand

0255075100May 1431%May 2134%May 2838%Jun 442%Jun 1147%LoversNeutralHaters

Reading this chart: Lovers growing from 31% → 47% over four weeks signals a campaign that created real demand. The neutral middle is shrinking — the brand is escaping the indifferent zone. Hater share held flat, suggesting no backlash from the lift.

Know before it's a story.

The worst moment to learn about a brewing narrative is the call — from your CEO, your board chair, or a journalist — that you're not ready for. The Siren watches for sharp movement in your brand's conversation — sentiment breaking downward, volume spiking, a new negative narrative gaining share — and alerts you while the window to shape the story is still open.

It works in both directions. A viral moment you catch in hour two is an opportunity. The same moment discovered next Tuesday is a missed quarter.

Every alert is reviewed by a human analyst before it reaches you. No false-alarm fatigue, no robo-noise.

Sentiment break detected2h ago

Negative narrative gaining share on Reddit /r/personalfinance — 340 posts in 4h

Volume spike: brand + competitorYesterday

Brand mention volume +180% vs. 7-day avg. Competitor X named in 62% of posts.

Positive signal: launch coverageMay 30

New product launch driving Lover share +8 pts in 48h. TikTok leading the lift.

Illustrative alerts — not live data

AI Perception Scan — Week of Jun 7

ChatGPTRecommendedHigh conf.

Mentions brand as a leading option in the category with strong reviews.

PerplexityNeutral mentionMedium conf.

Cited as one of several options, no strong positive or negative framing.

ClaudeNot mentionedLow conf.

Category query returned two competitors; brand absent from response.

Illustrative snapshot — not live data

What does AI say when someone asks about you?

GapWatch queries the major AI assistants about your brand and category on a recurring basis, tracking whether they recommend you, how they describe you, and how confident their knowledge is. Each reading carries a confidence badge, so you know when to act on a signal and when to discount it.

Legacy media monitoring can't see this channel at all. We treat it as a first-class signal — because your next customer may never see your ad, but they will see the answer an AI gives about you.

Did it move the needle? Now you can answer with a chart.

Tie a campaign, launch, or announcement to a date range and GapWatch shows you what actually shifted: mention volume, sentiment, polarization, share of conversation against the competitors you name, and which platforms carried the lift. Stance-aware classification means we can track how people are reacting to the thing you did — not just whether your name came up.

+180%

Mention volume

vs. 30-day pre-launch avg

+11 pts

Lover share shift

over 4-week campaign window

+6 pts

Share of conversation

vs. primary competitor

Illustrative figures — not live data

Methodology you can put in front of your quant team.

Sources

Reddit, X, TikTok, Bluesky, YouTube, Hacker News, and curated RSS/web feeds — aggregated, deduplicated, and refreshed continuously.

Confidence-graded everything.

Every brand carries a data-sufficiency grade (A/B/C), and metrics ship with confidence intervals. If the data is thin, we say so instead of pretending.

Point-in-time snapshots.

Every report is frozen with an explicit "as of" date. The numbers you share with your CMO won't change under you.

Human-validated AI.

All AI-generated analysis passes through a centralized editorial-controls layer and, for client-facing alerts, human review.

Published methodology.

The scoring framework, its assumptions, and its limitations are documented and open to scrutiny. Read it →

Built for the people who own the brand problem.

Brand & marketing leaders

Track campaign lift, share of conversation, and whether your brand is escaping the indifferent middle. Built for the questions your agency deck doesn't answer.

In-house communications teams

Crisis radar with lead time. See narratives forming before they reach a reporter's inbox, with the receipts to brief leadership.

Founders & challenger brands

Watch the category leader's conversation next to your own. Know where their lovers are soft and their haters are loud.

Intelligence your team will actually open.

Live brand panel for your teamWeekly Brand Digest emailOne-button board-ready exportsSiren alerts when it mattersAnalyst walkthrough of your first report, included

Built on published marketing science.

GapWatch's brand framework is led by Dr. Robert Mackalski — PhD in marketing, professor, and Harvard Business Review case study author — and refined through expert review with senior marketing, agency, and communications leaders.

See your brand the way the internet sees it.

Thirty minutes. Your brand, live. No deck.

Book a walkthrough