Both sides blame elites but fight each other instead, observers note

**Summary**

The story centers on a claim that both political sides blame "the elites" for problems, yet direct their anger primarily at each other rather than at those elites. The underlying premise appears to be an observation about political rhetoric and behavior—that anti-establishment sentiment exists across the spectrum but manifests as intra-partisan conflict rather than unified action against concentrated power.

**Dominant Framings**

Reddit discussion clusters around two interpretations. One frames this as a structural or rhetorical paradox: if both sides genuinely oppose elites, why does partisan conflict dominate? Another thread treats the claim skeptically, with posts about "left-wing politics based on calling people names" and defenses of Columbus Day suggesting users view the "both sides blame elites" framing itself as a rhetorical tactic or false equivalence. A third post references historical precedent (Jackson's Bank War), suggesting some users see elite-versus-populace conflict as a recurring pattern in American politics.

**Notable Disagreement**

Engagement is sparse (8 Reddit mentions, 3 mainstream articles), and sentiment appears divided rather than coalescing. Some users seem to accept the premise as valid observation; others appear to reject it as a rhetorical device that obscures real differences between left and right. The presence of posts defending Columbus Day and critiquing "left-wing name-calling" suggests at least some commenters view the story itself as partisan framing rather than neutral analysis.